METH-ENT · ENTITY RESOLUTION v3.2

Entity resolution, defensibly.

How Acren resolves LLCs, partnerships, trusts, and operator personas across Secretary-of-State filings, recorder activity, registered-agent history, and signal corroboration — and how it surfaces ambiguity rather than hiding it. Designed to be reviewable by an analyst, not just trusted by a UI.

Inputs.

Secretary of State filings

Formations, amendments, dissolutions, member updates, reg-agent changes.

Recorder activity

Grantor / grantee chains; entity names as they appear at recording.

Registered-agent history

Switch dates; reg-agent clustering for serial-shell detection.

Signal corroboration

Acquisition, refi, and transfer events used to corroborate entity edges.

Address normalization

Filing and recording addresses normalized cross-source.

Entity matches are graph edges, not hidden assumptions.

Acren stores relationship confidence, supporting records, conflicting evidence, and review status so owner/entity context can be shown, summarized, withheld, or rejected.

  1. Blocking

    Multi-pass blocking on name, address, agent, jurisdiction.

  2. Pairwise scoring

    Deterministic + probabilistic match with feature weights.

  3. Cluster build

    Edges built; conflicts surfaced not silenced.

  4. Persona layer

    Cross-entity operator persona derived above legal entities.

  5. Review gate

    Promotion to customer-facing requires reviewed thresholds.

  6. Feedback loop

    Customer feedback flows back to scoring weights and QA.

Confidence labels and what they mean.

LabelThresholdCustomer visibilityUse in ranking
Source-backedMulti-source agreementVisibleFull weight
Appears connectedSingle source · partial corroborationVisible · labeledPartial weight
Needs reviewWeak match or contestedInternal onlyExcluded
RejectedContradicting evidenceSuppressed · retained for auditExcluded

Edge cases.

Series LLCs

Parent and protected series treated as distinct nodes with linkage labels.

Nominee trusts

Disclosed beneficiaries surfaced; undisclosed parties stay as labeled gaps.

Jurisdictional aliases

Same operator across states is clustered, not silently merged.

Common-name collisions

Disambiguated by filing trail; weak matches stay internal-only.

Foreign registrations

Foreign-state registrations preserved with state-of-formation primacy.

Dissolved entities

Retained with status and date — historical research depends on this.

Opportunity memo preview
conf · 0.91 · source-backed
Entity match · Resolved owner entity → operator persona Resolved operator persona.
Match basis
Reg-agent overlap (3 entities) · members of record overlap · address cluster
Supporting filings
SOS-FRM ×3 · SOS-AMD ×4 · SOS-AGT ×2
Confidence
Source-backed (0.91)
Open questions
One candidate entity (Candidate related entity) awaiting QA.
Rejected candidates
Rejected candidate entity · contradicting reg-agent history
Review status
Promoted · reviewer signoff 2026-05-22
Display posture
Customer-facing · labeled
Next action
  • Review packet
    Inspect every supporting record
  • Save to universe
    Add to reviewed acquisition set
  • Move to needs research
    Flag open questions
  • Assign analyst
    Route to team workflow
  • Monitor
    Watch for source updates
Why surface ambiguity instead of picking a winner?+
Because a wrong silent merge is harder to recover from than a labeled uncertainty. Analysts can act on a known gap. They cannot act on a hidden mistake.
Can the same entity appear in two personas?+
Yes, with explicit notes. Personas are evidence-derived, not authoritative — they help research, support research judgment.
How often is the model re-trained?+
Weights are reviewed quarterly. Edge-level decisions are reviewable per packet; nothing relies on opaque seasonal drift.
Responsible use

Responsible boundary

Responsible boundary. Not for FCRA-regulated use. Acren organizes commercial-property and business-entity records and ranks research priority from recorded evidence. It does not predict intent, provide valuation or underwriting, or support consumer-eligibility decisions.

Responsible use

Source trail required

Every recommendation must carry source trails, field-level rights status, and open questions.

Responsible use

Review before action

Customers are responsible for verifying records before outreach, capital, or workflow decisions.

Responsible use

Display rules built in

Customer-facing, summarized, internal-only, and withheld fields stay visible as product controls.

Entity methodology

See entity resolution in your jurisdictions.

Access reviews include entity-resolution readiness for the entity or property context you bring.

Next step
Start with your market and buy box.

Responsible boundary. Not for FCRA-regulated use. Acren organizes commercial-property and business-entity records and ranks research priority from recorded evidence. It does not predict intent, provide valuation or underwriting, or support consumer-eligibility decisions.