Use the same five columns
Claim, supporting evidence, verification gap, display rules, and reviewer. Resist adding 'notes' — push detail into evidence.
An evidence ledger turns each research claim into a row with supporting records, a verification gap, and a display rules. Adopt this format and your team's work becomes reviewable — by your investors, your counsel, and your future self.
A research memo describes the conclusion. A ledger captures the work. When the deal closes (or doesn't), or when counsel asks how a claim was reached, the ledger is the document that answers. Acren ships packets in this format; this template lets your team standardize the same shape internally.
| Claim | Supporting evidence | Verification gap | Display rules |
|---|---|---|---|
| Property record has entity context | Deed + entity registration match (REC-DED · SOS-ENT) | None | Customer-visible |
| Properties appear related (assemblage) | Adjacent parcel + shared registered agent (ASR-PARC · SOS-ENT) | Owner-of-record needs confirmation | Customer-visible · labeled 'Appears connected' |
| Operator distinct from owner | Operator filing + on-site signage | Operator entity not in SoS source | Generalized |
| Entity is successor to dissolved LLC | Officer overlap + agent overlap | Successor filing not yet recorded | Internal only |
| Relationship rejected | Contradicting deed history (REC-DED) | — | Suppressed |
| Facility carries permit context | Building permit context (PMT-BLD) | Permit detail is generalized | Generalized |
| Owner has portfolio of 5+ adjacent parcels | Cross-portfolio entity links + parcel adjacency | Two links 'Appears connected' | Customer-visible · labeled |
Claim, supporting evidence, verification gap, display rules, and reviewer. Resist adding 'notes' — push detail into evidence.
Compound claims hide gaps. Split them — your reviewer thanks you later.
Source IDs (REC-DED, SOS-ENT) survive URL rot. Keep a /sources mirror.
If the gap column is empty, the row hasn't been reviewed yet. 'None' is a valid gap.
Decide customer-visible / generalized / internal-only / suppressed at row creation, not at the end.
Claim · Evidence · Gap · Posture · Reviewer.
Compound claims get split.
REC-* · ASR-* · SOS-* · PMT-*.
'None' is valid; empty is not.
Customer-visible / Generalized / Internal / Suppressed.
| Pattern | Why rejected | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Row with no source ID | Not reviewable. | Add source ID or label as 'Internal only / unsourced.' |
| 'Owner appears to be X' with no label | Confidence not declared. | Apply confidence label per the checklist. |
| Verification gap left blank | Reviewer cannot tell if rev was done. | Write 'None' if applicable; otherwise list gaps. |
| Customer-visible field on a generalized source | Display-rule mismatch. | Demote to generalized or remove from packet. |
| Multi-property claim in one row | Hides per-property gaps. | Split into one row per property. |
Acren ranks commercial property research priority. It does not infer disposition, hardship, or willingness to transact.
Every recommendation must carry supporting records, field-level rights status, and verification gaps.
Customers are responsible for verifying records before outreach, capital, or workflow decisions.
Customer-visible, generalized, internal-only, and suppressed fields stay visible as product controls.
Every Acren evidence packet is a ledger like this — with the source records inlined.