Evidence ledger template.

An evidence ledger turns each research claim into a row with supporting records, a verification gap, and a display rules. Adopt this format and your team's work becomes reviewable — by your investors, your counsel, and your future self.

Why a ledger, not a memo.

A research memo describes the conclusion. A ledger captures the work. When the deal closes (or doesn't), or when counsel asks how a claim was reached, the ledger is the document that answers. Acren ships packets in this format; this template lets your team standardize the same shape internally.

Ledger structure.

ClaimSupporting evidenceVerification gapDisplay rules
Property record has entity contextDeed + entity registration match (REC-DED · SOS-ENT)NoneCustomer-visible
Properties appear related (assemblage)Adjacent parcel + shared registered agent (ASR-PARC · SOS-ENT)Owner-of-record needs confirmationCustomer-visible · labeled 'Appears connected'
Operator distinct from ownerOperator filing + on-site signageOperator entity not in SoS sourceGeneralized
Entity is successor to dissolved LLCOfficer overlap + agent overlapSuccessor filing not yet recordedInternal only
Relationship rejectedContradicting deed history (REC-DED)Suppressed
Facility carries permit contextBuilding permit context (PMT-BLD)Permit detail is generalizedGeneralized
Owner has portfolio of 5+ adjacent parcelsCross-portfolio entity links + parcel adjacencyTwo links 'Appears connected'Customer-visible · labeled

How to adopt the template.

Use the same five columns

Claim, supporting evidence, verification gap, display rules, and reviewer. Resist adding 'notes' — push detail into evidence.

One claim per row

Compound claims hide gaps. Split them — your reviewer thanks you later.

Cite source IDs, not URLs

Source IDs (REC-DED, SOS-ENT) survive URL rot. Keep a /sources mirror.

Make gaps mandatory

If the gap column is empty, the row hasn't been reviewed yet. 'None' is a valid gap.

Set display rules before sharing

Decide customer-visible / generalized / internal-only / suppressed at row creation, not at the end.

  1. Copy the column header

    Claim · Evidence · Gap · Posture · Reviewer.

  2. Create one row per atomic claim

    Compound claims get split.

  3. Cite source IDs

    REC-* · ASR-* · SOS-* · PMT-*.

  4. Fill in the gap explicitly

    'None' is valid; empty is not.

  5. Set display rules before sharing

    Customer-visible / Generalized / Internal / Suppressed.

Common rejected patterns.

PatternWhy rejectedFix
Row with no source IDNot reviewable.Add source ID or label as 'Internal only / unsourced.'
'Owner appears to be X' with no labelConfidence not declared.Apply confidence label per the checklist.
Verification gap left blankReviewer cannot tell if rev was done.Write 'None' if applicable; otherwise list gaps.
Customer-visible field on a generalized sourceDisplay-rule mismatch.Demote to generalized or remove from packet.
Multi-property claim in one rowHides per-property gaps.Split into one row per property.
Responsible use

Research priority, not seller intent

Acren ranks commercial property research priority. It does not infer disposition, hardship, or willingness to transact.

Responsible use

Source evidence required

Every recommendation must carry supporting records, field-level rights status, and verification gaps.

Responsible use

Verification before action

Customers are responsible for verifying records before outreach, capital, or workflow decisions.

Responsible use

Display rules built in

Customer-visible, generalized, internal-only, and suppressed fields stay visible as product controls.

Continue

See how Acren ships packets in this shape.

Every Acren evidence packet is a ledger like this — with the source records inlined.

Continue
See how each opportunity keeps the source trail attached.