METH-VAL · VALIDATION v3.0

Source review for opportunity memos.

Source review is the quality gate behind the ranked property pipeline. It is not the product promise; it is why a recommendation reason is reviewable. Recommendation reasons need supporting records, weak owner/entity links are labeled or withheld, unsupported fields become open questions, and missing data is not filled with model guesses.

Inputs.

Corroboration

Number of independent sources that agree on the claim.

Source posture

Review state, rights posture, and field readiness for the source class.

Source weight

Recorder > derived index; primary > scraped derivative.

Graph resolution quality

Confidence of underlying entity / property edges.

QA review

Reviewer signoff for promotion to customer-facing.

Graph relationships are validated before promotion.

Acren validates graph relationships before promoting them into customer-facing opportunity memos. Reviewed coverage, field quality, display posture, source posture, and QA state determine whether a graph edge can be used, summarized, withheld, or routed for review.

Confidence bands and behavior.

BandScoreCustomer visibilityBehavior
Source-backed≥ 0.85VisibleFull weight in ranking
Likely0.65–0.85Visible · labeledReduced weight in ranking
Appears connected0.40–0.65Visible · labeledExcluded from auto-actions
Needs review< 0.40Internal onlyExcluded from customer surfaces
RejectedContradictedSuppressedRetained for audit
  1. Score

    Compute confidence from inputs.

  2. Threshold

    Apply band thresholds and promotion gates.

  3. Surface gaps

    Render missing fields and conflicts explicitly.

  4. QA review

    Reviewed promotion to customer-facing.

  5. Replay

    Reproduce any claim end to end from sources.

  6. Feedback

    Customer feedback flows back to scoring weights.

Failure modes Acren refuses.

Single-source unlabeled inference

Never surfaced as source-backed.

Silent merges

Disagreements are retained on the node and labeled.

Implied readiness

Source posture is shown per field, not implied per page.

Black-box ranking

Inputs and weights ship in the packet; nothing is opaque.

Coverage halo

A claim from a not-customer-ready cell never appears in customer ranking.

Why ship every input with the claim?+
Because replay is the only honest test of source review. If a third party cannot reproduce the score from the inputs, the score is not reviewable.
How are weights chosen?+
Weights are reviewed with input from QA, customer feedback, and source-class behavior. Changes are versioned and reflected in the packet.
What about conflicting records?+
Both records are retained. The packet shows the disagreement, the responsible sources, and the resolution status. Analysts choose how to act.
Responsible use

Responsible boundary

Responsible boundary. Not for FCRA-regulated use. Acren organizes commercial-property and business-entity records and ranks research priority from recorded evidence. It does not predict intent, provide valuation or underwriting, or support consumer-eligibility decisions.

Responsible use

Source trail required

Every recommendation must carry source trails, field-level rights status, and open questions.

Responsible use

Review before action

Customers are responsible for verifying records before outreach, capital, or workflow decisions.

Responsible use

Display rules built in

Customer-facing, summarized, internal-only, and withheld fields stay visible as product controls.

Source review

See source review inside an opportunity memo.

Sample-packet reviews include source, field, display, and review status for the asset class and markets you bring.

Next step
Start with your market and buy box.

Responsible boundary. Not for FCRA-regulated use. Acren organizes commercial-property and business-entity records and ranks research priority from recorded evidence. It does not predict intent, provide valuation or underwriting, or support consumer-eligibility decisions.